mobi files I exported wouldn’t open in calibre. The files I converted to EPUB turned out fairly well, although the. While Calligra Words has a limited number of import and export filters, there is one pleasant surprise: the ability to convert your documents to EPUB and. There are no window decorations, menus, or toolbars to pull you away from your writing. It also has a distraction-free mode, which takes over your screen and shows only what you’re writing. Calligra Words gives you a lot of control over all elements of a document, and it uses ODT as its native format. You get all the advanced features you’d expect in a word processor, ranging from text manipulation to handling tables and images. It does just about everything that LibreOffice Writer does, and actually does one or two things that Writer doesn’t. Calligra WordsĬalligra Words is easily the most powerful of the three word processors I’ll look at in this article. If you’re in the market for an alternative to Writer that’s also open source, test drive these three word processors. But LibreOffice Writer isn’t the only game in town.
#C64 WORD WRITER 3 FREE#
Sure, the number of free and open source word processors has dwindled over the years. That said, Writer isn’t everyone’s favorite word processor or their go-to application for writing. It’s hard to dispute LibreOffice Writer’s position at the top of the free and open source word processor food chain-both in popularity and in the number of features it has. It’s familiar, it’s powerful, and it does everything that I need a word processor to do. When I do need to use a word processor, I turn to LibreOffice Writer. I checked this using a text editor in linux and libreoffice in linux and both time the files looked correct.Įdit: Small edit to program to adjust screen printing of data.Even though I write for a living, I rarely use a word processor these days I do most of my work in a text editor. If your line feeds don't translate, you may need to change this character. Line 55 turns it into ASCII 10, which is the line feed character.
#C64 WORD WRITER 3 CODE#
Speedscript uses the left arrow (screen code 31) for line feed. Line 40 in the code looks for the up-arrow to escape the loop (30 is the screen code for the up arrow). You can change it to something else, but it needs to be something not used elsewhere in your document. I used the up-arrow (shift 6) to mark the end. d64 image files, you'll still have to pull the file from the image to use it.Īt the end of your speedscript document you need an end of file marker so this program knows when it's done processing the file. I whipped it up quickly to see if it would work. There is nothing fancy about this program. It's written in BASIC so it's kind of slow, but it works. The program below will convert screen codes to regular ASCII and save it. Speedscript files are stored in memory starting at 10240 (line 20 marks the start of the stack).
I use speedscript if I'm writing on the C64 and it saves files using the screen codes for the C64. Converting it to a readable format will be the tricky bit.
#C64 WORD WRITER 3 PC#
TL DR: Not impossible, but getting the file to a PC is the easy part. Of course, there are plenty of other WPs out there. I had forgotten this, but it might mean that the save format is simple enough to figure out, which may be the best solution to your question. That said, I decided to go looking for information on Mini Office II, that I owned (presumably still own, somewhere) back in the day, and according to its Wikipedia article it's possible to load and read documents saved with its WP without needing the WP program in memory.
There's also the fact that the text parts will be likely stored in PETSCII not ASCII, and one can only speculate about any non-PETSCII characters that might be supported, such as accented letters or entirely foreign inclusions.
I would suspect that most C64 word processors (WPs) would store things in a proprietary format that may or may not include control characters.ĭue to the limited space available, control characters would be the more likely storage format, and there's unlikely to have been any sort of standardisation between different WPs.